{mp3}rolet-russi-weiqi-1{/mp3}
بهمن شفیق
12 شهریور 1401
3 سپتامبر 2022
برخی منابع مورد استفاده:
http://davidharvey.org/2022/02/remarks-on-recent-events-in-the-ukraine-a-provisional-statement/
ریچارد ولف
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GsTqe1XuL4Y
مایکل هادسون
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlUSqQ8U8T8&t=164s
Gewinninflation Greedflation
Die Frage ist: Warum betreiben die politischen und ökonomischen Eliten eine Politik, die in einer Rezession enden könnte und mehr Armut in Kauf nimmt? Es könnte sein, dass sie wie in den 1970er Jahren die Inflation ausnutzen wollen, um eine Rezession herbeizuführen und die Arbeitslosigkeit in die Höhe zu treiben. Damit könnten sie einer gestiegenen Verhandlungsmacht der Beschäftigten im Voraus begegnen. So die Vermutung von Thomas Fazi (makroskop.eu, 22.6.2022), einem italienischen Schriftsteller und Journalisten. Ein neuer neoliberaler Rollback also.
https://www.akweb.de/politik/inflation-lohn-preis-spirale-warum-steigen-die-preise/https://makroskop.eu/22-2022/inflation-diesmal-darf-nicht-das-kapital-gewinnen/
Demokraten vs. FED, Greedflation und hohe Zinsraten
https://www.handelsblatt.com/politik/international/steigende-preise-sind-gierige-konzerne-schuld-in-den-usa-ist-ein-streit-ueber-die-gruende-der-inflation-entbrannt/28435604.html
Nun ist erneut Krise – und auch Merkels Nachfolger Olaf Scholz (SPD) setzt auf die Einbindung der Gewerkschaftsspitzen. Dass er diese und die Unternehmerverbände erstmals Anfang Juli ausgerechnet unter der Überschrift »Konzertierte Aktion« ins Kanzleramt bat, soll wohl die große Bedeutung der Treffen unterstreichen. Auf Gewerkschaftsseite weckt der Titel allerdings eher ungute Erinnerungen. Denn die vom damaligen SPD-Wirtschaftsminister Karl Schiller 1967 angestoßene »Konzertierte Aktion« führte vor allem dazu, dass sich die Beschäftigtenorganisationen bei ihren Lohnforderungen mäßigten. Zehn Jahre hielten sie es in dem Bündnis aus, erst 1977 und dann endgültig ein Jahr später ließen sie es platzen.
Die Kapitalseite nutzt stattdessen die Krise, um soziale Errungenschaften zu attackieren. So zum Beispiel Arbeitgeberpräsident Rainer Dulger, der die Deckelung der Sozialbeiträge, die »Dynamisierung« – sprich: Erhöhung – des Rentenalters und die »Reform« – sprich: den Abbau – der Sozialsysteme fordert. Oder der Präsident des Bundesverbandes der Deutschen Industrie, Siegfried Russwurm, der, unterstützt vom ehemaligen SPD-Bundesarbeitsminister Sigmar Gabriel, längere Wochenarbeitszeiten verlangt.
https://www.nd-aktuell.de/artikel/1165757.konzertierte-aktion-schluss-mit-klassenkampf.html
https://www.credit-suisse.com/about-us-news/en/articles/news-and-expertise/we-are-witnessing-the-birth-of-a-new-world-monetary-order-202203.html
“We are witnessing the birth of Bretton Woods III – a new world (monetary) order centered around commodity-based currencies in the East that will likely weaken the Eurodollar system and also contribute to inflationary forces in the West.”
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/why-united-nations-promoting-kind-food-production-proven-reduce-yields-raise-prices-and
One month after the Colombo meeting in 2019, which generated significant media attention in Sri Lanka, voters in that nation elected an anti-fertilizer president, H.E. Gotabaya Rajapaksa, who claimed, without scientific evidence, that synthetic fertilizers were causing kidney diseases. In April 2021, he banned fertilizer imports.
In June, 2021, two months after the fertilizer ban, Sri Lanka hosted a UN-sponsored “Food System Dialogue” aimed at influencing the UN’s broader anti-fertilizer agenda for the world. “Sri Lanka’s inaugural Food System Dialogue is part of a series of national and provincial dialogues conducted by the Ministry of Agriculture ahead of the 2021 UN Food System Summit set to take place in New York later this year.”
https://michael-hudson.com/2021/09/george-soross-dream-to-turn-china-into-a-neoliberal-grabitization-opportunity/
https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2022/08/22/the-economic-ties-that-bind-china/
China is the world’s largest trading nation and becoming more important. Whereas total US goods trade fell to US$3.8 trillion in 2020 from US$4.2 trillion in 2019 before recovering to US$4.7 trillion in 2021, total Chinese trade in goods increased from US$4.6 trillion in 2019 to US$4.7 trillion in 2020 and grew to a staggering US$6 trillion in 2021. China’s trade is predominantly market-driven, not state-driven. The private sector accounts for roughly 92 per cent of China’s exports, of which 42 per cent are from foreign invested firms. That is a huge constraint on policymakers.
Trade in goods between China and the United States grew 19 per cent in 2021 to US$693 billion according to US data, even though China fell short of the agreed purchases of US goods under their Phase One trade deal.
American companies expanded their operations in China with US$38 billion of new investment in 2021 to bring the US stock of direct investment in China to US$118 billion. Japanese investment into China also continued to increase, further integrating their economies. Total direct investment flows into China rose by a third in 2021 to a record high of US$334 billion for the year. That’s a lot of businesses committing to the Chinese market with new factories and operations even with Chinese borders closed and harsh domestic policies in pursuit of zero-Covid.
https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2022/08/29/albanese-government-styles-a-new-foreign-policy-direction/
https://nationalinterest.org/feature/no-matter-who-wins-ukraine-america-has-already-lost-204288
https://deutsche-wirtschafts-nachrichten.de/521362/Neue-Weltordnung-Platzt-die-transatlantische-Illusionsblase
https://deutsche-wirtschafts-nachrichten.de/521308/Gegen-den-Dollar-Tuerkei-bezahlt-Gas-kuenftig-in-Rubel
https://deutsche-wirtschafts-nachrichten.de/521282/Ohne-den-Dollar-Indien-bezahlt-massive-Kohle-Importe-in-anderen-Waehrungen
Indiens Unternehmen importieren massiv Kohle aus Russland, und die Zolldaten zeigen, dass sie diesen wichtigen Rohstoff heute kaum noch in Dollar bezahlen.
https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2022/09/02/the-us-china-standard-off-over-technology/#more-1153676
This vigilance is being strengthened under US President Joe Biden who published a paper in 2020 emphasising that the rules of the international economy should not be rigged against the United States. The paper argues that the United States should continue its ‘70-year’ role in writing the rules of trade and technology. He also calls for cooperation between likeminded countries ‘in confront[ing] China’s abusive behaviour’.
Standards are one of the pillars of global rule-setting. The Biden administration’s 100-day review of supply chains for products of strategic significance ‘identifies key areas where government could play a more active role in setting standards and incentivising high-road business practices’. China similarly sees standards as a strategic vehicle through which to achieve a new world order. Its Belt and Road Initiative emphasises standards cooperation and Beijing has signed 52 standards cooperation agreements as of September 2019.
China’s growing influence over standardisation and the US response illustrates that such standards are not just a tool for technical, industrial or economic competition — they are also a geopolitical consideration. This confrontation will intensify as China formulates its ‘China Standards 2035’ vision — a sequel to Beijing’s strategic industrial policy, ‘Made in China 2025’.
But while Made in China 2025 pursues dominance in the production of goods, China Standards 2035 aims to control the rules governing emerging technologies. Since ‘global technical standards are still being formed’, Chinese companies and organisations want to enhance their ‘right to speak’ in setting international technical standards for emerging technologies of the fourth industrial revolution and digital transformation like 5G, AI and quantum computing.
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/07/15/how-likely-universal-basic-income-is-in-the-us.html
https://www.technologyreview.com/2021/05/07/1024674/ubi-guaranteed-income-pandemic/
The idea of “just giving people money” has been in and out of the news since becoming a favored cause for many high-profile Silicon Valley entrepreneurs, including Twitter’s Jack Dorsey, Facebook cofounders Mark Zuckerberg and (separately) Chris Hughes, and Singularity University’s Peter Diamandis. They proposed a universal basic income as a solution to the job losses and social conflict that would be wrought by automation and artificial intelligence—the very technologies their own companies create.
But while prominent names in technology are still involved today, especially when it comes to funding projects, the conversation has changed. Its center of gravity has shifted away from “universal basic income” aimed at counterbalancing the automation of work and toward “guaranteed income” aimed at addressing economic and racial injustices.
https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202208/1272069.shtml
PLA is not afraid to fight for defending sovereignty and security: Global Times editorial
https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202208/1271960.shtml
https://multipolarista.com/2022/07/28/west-neoliberal-recovery-conference/
http://johnhelmer.net/sri-lankas-arrest-of-aeroflot-plane-was-the-straw-that-broke-president-rajapaksas-back/